Impostor Syndrome

I’d heard about Impostor Syndrome off and on throughout grad school, a term to describe the almost omnipresent yet seldom admitted phenomenon by which otherwise talented folks are convinced, deep inside, that they’re just not as good as their peers. (There’s obvious irony when a large fraction of people consider themselves below par, especially in a highly selective environment.) Virtually everyone I ever had this conversation with, in a moment of soul-baring honesty, admitted to such doubts and comparisons. It can manifest in many ways: “I got lucky on that test.” “The admissions committee made a mistake and let me in.” “Yeah, I got an A+, but I didn’t really deserve it.” Another big sign is deflecting or diluting compliments that are received.

Recently, though, I hunted down the original 1978 paper that gave this phenomenon a name: “The Imposter Phenomenon in High Achieving Women: Dynamics and Therapeutic Intervention” and boy, is it a fascinating read. I hadn’t realized that the phenomenon was associated with women initially, or primarily (the authors include a footnote about male impostor syndrome on the first page); I’ve certainly encountered men who also experience it.

There are lots of interesting elements in this paper, but one in particular stood out to me. They made an effort to trace adult impostor syndrome back to patterns in family life, and this resulted in two rough groups. One is based on having a sibling who is the designated Smart One, so you never quite get recognized for your own accomplishments, and eventually you start to doubt their validity. The other comes from being the Smart One, and in fact, having everything you do praised and supported and validated. Ultimately you start to devalue praise, since it doesn’t seem to correlate with actual performance, and even worse, if you do struggle or fail at something, you’re entirely unprepared for how to deal with it, and it can become a core of nagging doubt and insecurity because you’re still trying to inhabit the image of perfection placed on you. In both cases, well intentioned parenting can, apparently, have these long-term effects.

Want to find out if you suffer from Impostor Syndrome? You can take the test and get a quantitative result — but if you’re honest with yourself, you probably already know.

7 Comments
7 of 7 people learned something from this entry.

  1. Michael Littman said,

    July 13, 2012 at 8:52 pm

    (Learned something new!)

    Yay, I’m in the highest category! That makes me feel good about myself. Briefly.

    Seriously, though, are there high achieving people that don’t suffer from IP? I always assumed it was universal. What do other people do with all that extra time they would otherwise be using to question their self worth?

  2. Kiri said,

    July 14, 2012 at 12:10 am

    (Learned something new!)

    Wow, impressive! I scored a 61. I would NOT have pegged you for a high scorer :)

    are there high achieving people that don’t suffer from IP?
    That’s the funny thing, isn’t it? They’re already “high-achieving.” I guess we just keep ratcheting our bars higher and higher.

  3. Wendy McRae said,

    July 14, 2012 at 12:33 am

    (Learned something new!)

    Kiri, that paper was a really interesting read and really expanded my thinking about the all-too-familiar Impostor Syndrome — thank you.

    The part about “the Smart One” reminds me of the research by Carol Dweck on the different “mindsets” encouraged by praising children for ability or for effort. Dweck strongly advocates praising children for effort and teaching them that you can get smarter by persevering with challenging tasks. I wonder, though, if that would be enough to combat the development of the Impostor Syndrome. I think we (teachers, parents, society) still send very mixed messages to girls about whether it’s acceptable for a woman to be a confident and audacious intellectual.

  4. Michael Austin said,

    July 14, 2012 at 10:08 am

    (Learned something new!)

    Wow.. I completely relate to this. I remember as a kid how afraid I was of failure. I felt like I had to be amazing to even break even and meet people’s expectations.

    “Ultimately you start to devalue praise, since it doesn’t seem to correlate with actual performance, and even worse, if you do struggle or fail at something, you’re entirely unprepared for how to deal with it, and it can become a core of nagging doubt and insecurity because you’re still trying to inhabit the image of perfection placed on you.”

  5. Michael Austin said,

    July 14, 2012 at 10:14 am

    (Learned something new!)

    82

  6. Natarajan Krishnaswami said,

    July 14, 2012 at 11:31 am

    (Learned something new!)

    Neat find! The prevalence among high achievers might be due to a cognitive bias like the Dunning-Krueger effect:

    Actual competence may weaken self-confidence, as competent individuals may falsely assume that others have an equivalent understanding. As Kruger and Dunning conclude, “the miscalibration of the incompetent stems from an error about the self, whereas the miscalibration of the highly competent stems from an error about others”

  7. Arun Iyer said,

    July 17, 2012 at 3:56 am

    (Learned something new!)

    Wow, that was something new I learnt. I can relate with this in so many ways, especially given that I wrote a poetry on this pretty much :-)

Post a Comment

I knew this already. I learned something new!